Monday, January 21, 2013

Film Review: Morgan (2012)


Written by: Sandon Berg and Michael Akers
Directed by: Michael Akers
Film Distributor: United Gay Network
Starring:
Leo Minaya as Morgan Oliver
Jack Kesy as Dean Kagen 
Supporting Cast:
Madalyn McKay as Peg Oliver
Darra ‘Like Dat’ Boyd as Lane Williams
Benjamin Budd as Wesley Blake
Theodore Bouloukos as Dr. Thomas
Dane Anton as Physical Therapist

Official Film Trailer:

Synopsis
Morgan Oliver is recently paraplegic, T-10 incomplete, as a result of a bicycle accident during a race he was competing in.  He has recently returned home from rehab and he’s now unemployed and living on disability, adjusting to his new life and the new adaptive setup in his apartment.  His preferred way to pass the time is drinking beer and watching television, and the main events of the film begin when he runs out of beer and neither his mother, Peg, nor his best friend, Lane, will enable him any further.  They refuse to buy him more beer, forcing him to leave the house on his own.  It is during his trip out to replenish his beer supplies that he meets Dean Kagen, which is where our romance begins.
The drama unfolds once Morgan decides he wants to compete in the wheelchair division of the very same race that cost him his ability to walk, where Morgan, because of his hyper-competitive nature, caused an accident involving himself and two other competitors on a very dangerous part of the course.  This same hyper-competitive nature leads to his doing things he ought not to be doing and refusing to listen to reason from Dean, his doctor, or anyone else. 
This film is a journey for Morgan where he must confront his past and his present, and he must find a way to learn from his mistakes and move forward.  This is also, to a lesser extent, a journey for Dean in finding a new way to live following the death of his mother.  But most of all, it is a romance featuring a paraplegic romantic lead, which is something that is very rare to find.  And better yet, it is a romance that delves into the issue of disabled sexuality, which we almost never see on film.  And Morgan is pretty cute, too, so that helps. 
Fanvid by JJstrikesback1:

So how does it fare with regard to portrayal of a disabled character and disabled sexuality?
This is a male/male romance, but it is not a coming out story; rather, the central focus of the story is Morgan’s disability.  The film addresses both the disability and the romance from a variety of angles and is, I think, one of the most comprehensive films I’ve seen with regard to disability and romance.  It’s a low budget film with acting that could be better, but the writing/directing/production team of Michael Akers and Sandon Berg, as well as Leo Minaya, who played the title character, Morgan, did quite a lot of research in preparation for this film (though there are certainly some important gaps).  Leo Minaya is not paraplegic himself, and this was a deliberate casting decision on behalf of the filmmakers because the film originally was going to contain scenes of Morgan before his accident which ended up being cut from the final version of the film.  I think that things like Photoshop and body doubles could get around the reasons they cited for hiring a non-disabled actor instead of a disabled one, but the actor they cast was very dedicated to portraying the reality of Morgan’s paralysis.  There was a scene early on in the film where Dean helps Morgan with his leg exercises, and the director had instructed Leo Minaya to keep his leg up during the scene after Dean let go of it, and Mr. Minaya insisted that this would be impossible for Morgan to do and he made sure that the film reflected this.  There was another particular scene that was very physically intense, and in the commentary, the filmmakers point out multiple times that Leo Minaya refused to use his legs to help him with this very difficult scene, insisting on pulling himself back up and over the wall using only his arms.  A lot of actors, particularly in low budget indie films, might not have this kind of dedication to the role they were playing, and so although I think a paraplegic actor would have been preferable, Leo MInaya did a great job of being Morgan.  Leo Minaya and Jack Kesy are not gay in real life, either, but they managed to do a great job with that aspect of their roles, as well. 
There are three areas where I think the film suffered from the decision not to use a paraplegic actor –
·         First, in simple physical realism.  Morgan had a lot of muscle tone, and even for a guy less than a year post injury who is still actively doing physical therapy, there are just some things you can’t fake, and the appearance of a paraplegic’s legs and abdomen is one of them.  There were two scenes in particular where abdominal strength and control were slightly unrealistic.  The first is a scene where he’s in the shower on a shower chair and not using either of his arms to maintain his balance or keep from falling or sliding down.  The second is that there are a couple of scenes where he’s doing sit-ups, and I just don’t think that a T-10 paraplegic would be able to move the specific muscle combination necessary to do those particular exercises. 
·         The second area the film suffered from not casting a paraplegic actor is, of course, realism regarding bladder and bowel issues.  That’s something that is not touched on even one single time in the film, and Morgan doesn’t seem to use a catheter or go to the bathroom for anything other than a shower, ever.  Men I’ve known with SCI have always gone to the bathroom to sort everything that needs to be sorted before coming to the bed and being intimate, and I think it’s pretty standard to have at least one conversation about bladder and bowel issues at some point in the relationship.  This just wasn’t a feature in the film, but it’s something that really can’t be ignored in an intimate relationship with someone who is paraplegic.  I think this would have been very different had they used a paraplegic actor in the role.
·         And following from that, the third area where I think the film suffered from not using a paraplegic actor was that, although they did significantly address Morgan’s erectile dysfunction, one thing they forgot about was making sure he took his little blue pills before having sex with Dean, and also, for that matter, addressing whether and how much he could feel, as an incomplete paraplegic, when having sex.  Also, sex with a paraplegic guy is not a spontaneous act.  It requires preparation.  And also, I would have been really curious to see how they actually figured out the right positions and the best way to do things for both of them, which wasn’t really spelled out.  There were one or two great conversations before they became sexually active that addressed Morgan’s erectile dysfunction and Dean’s openness to figuring things out as they went along, but nothing at the time they finally did have sex for the first time or any time after that.  Also, there is a single scene in the film where, during sex, they show the scar as Dean runs his arm down Morgan’s back, and it’s not quite the Joel Brown “Personal Rockstar” video, but it is sensual and shows that they are making an effort to show this aspect of Morgan’s disability.  However, I think that the film would have been more realistic in this regard if the actor playing Morgan had been paraplegic himself.  
Other than these areas, though, I think that the research the writers did paid off, and you really can tell that they did their homework.  Also, they made Morgan and Dean both into well-rounded characters with flaws and quirks and issues that are not related to Morgan’s disability.  Morgan is hyper-competitive, afraid of public displays of affection, bad with money, and drinks a bit too much.  The writers say that the overarching theme for understanding Morgan’s issues is his issue with his own masculinity that dates back to when he was about 12 years old and his father left the family not long after finding out that Morgan was gay.  Dean has just gone through a long period of caring for an ailing mother who has recently died, and he never came out to her when she was alive and is still getting the hang of being an out gay man.  Their conflicts come not from Morgan’s disability but from his character flaws, and Dean is quite comfortable with Morgan’s disability from the very beginning.  This is also not a coming out film, although Dean is more recently out than Morgan.  This is a romance between two men whose major conflict is over Morgan’s hyper-competitiveness rather than his disability.   The romance is complex and grows organically, and their relationship is multi-faceted and fairly realistic.  Having watched not only the film, but also the deleted scenes, the Behind the Scenes Featurette, and the commentary, I’ve gotten to be quite familiar with the filmmakers’ thought processes as well as with the characters and the film itself, and I really think the filmmakers and the cast did an outstanding job at accomplishing this, despite my continued belief that the role would have been even better with a paraplegic actor.
Ironically, the writers got the idea for the film itself from a paraplegic actor who auditioned for another film they did together, who was kind enough to sit down with them and really talk about issues of being gay and paraplegic and dating, sex, etc.  During their conversation, they even touched on the topic of guys who wanted to be with someone who they perceived as “needing” them and guys with a “wheelchair fetish”.  Later on during the preparation for the film, they went to a disabled dating site and talked with two paraplegic men they connected with on there about their experiences and preferences when dating and their issues with sexuality.   Perhaps this is why I have such an issue with the fact that they went with a non-paraplegic actor, but really, they did do their research, and Leo Minaya did work very hard to ensure as much authenticity as possible in his portrayal of Morgan Oliver. 
Overall, I would recommend this film.  The characters are well-rounded and authentic, and there’s more to Morgan’s life than his disability.  Morgan and Dean’s relationship doesn’t shy away from the issues of Morgan’s disability, but it’s much more than that, as well.  And Morgan can’t get it up without a little blue pill, which shows that the filmmakers listened to the guys they talked to about paraplegic sexuality and erectile dysfunction.  It isn’t perfect, and I really wish they had used a paraplegic actor, but it is much more than we usually see, and in general, it is a good, complex film that tackles the issues we care about.  I’ve seen it three times now and it actually gets better each time I watch it as I notice more nuance and detail within the story. 
The official film website, which has links to the various places where the film is available, is:
I recommend actually getting the DVD so you can see the deleted scenes (which have more detail about his erectile dysfunction and other issues), and see the other special features, which I think will add to your understanding of and appreciation for the film and the filmmaking process.  It is currently available for $19.99 in Region 1 format on Amazon at:
Some media player programs, such as VLC Media Player, have versions that allow for region-free DVD playing, so even if you live outside of the United States and Canada, this version of the DVD may still work for you. 
Enjoy!

Film Review: The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)


When it comes to films portraying the post-war veteran experience in America, this film sets the gold standard.  Following the lives of three very different veterans returning home after World War II, it looks at the complexity of veterans' family lives and relationships, their struggles to find work, coping with serious injury and disability, and more.  One is a family man with nearly grown children; another is a newlywed who married his bride right before going off to war; and the third is a young man who is engaged to his childhood sweetheart.  They each face different challenges and different family and relationship dynamics upon their return, and because of this, we get to see a range of post-war veteran experiences rather than just one single experience.  This enhances the quality of this film rather than detracting from it, and it really draws us in to all of their lives.

The storytelling in this film is wonderfully rich and complex, and it tells a story that remains relevant to this day, with struggles our own recent veterans are now facing in readjusting to civilian life, finding work, and reconnecting with their loved ones as changed men and women who are not the same as they were before they went to war.  It has the added bonus of actually using a disabled veteran actor, Harold Russell, to play the disabled veteran character, Homer Parrish, a double arm amputee who uses prosthetic hooks.  Using disabled actors to play disabled characters is unfortunately quite rare in films even today.  My one criticism is that Harold Russell, who was an unknown newcomer when he was cast in this role, does not share top billing with the other leads, despite being a lead character himself, and I understand that this is a result of Hollywood star power buying top billing, but it is important to note that Harold Russell won two Oscars for his role as Homer Parrish in this film and did a superb job portraying the depth and complexity of this character.

For me, Homer was the most compelling character of the film.  He returns home having already been through rehab and occupational therapy and having learned how to use his prosthetic hooks to the best of his ability.  The film highlights many of the things he has learned how to do, as well as those things which he cannot do, with or without his hooks, such as buttoning his own shirt.  But the film also looks at his relationship with his high-school sweetheart turned fiancee, Wilma, and his fears and insecurities about facing her with his new reality.  My favorite scene in the film comes toward the end where Homer and Wilma finally address these fears.

If you are interested in stories that really explore the issues faced by returning veterans, I've seen none better than this one; and if you liked the post-Vietnam War film "Coming Home", you will love this film.  It has romance, drama, and above all, realism.  It is a true and seemingly timeless classic and I highly recommend it.  You won't be disappointed.

Book Review: Morning Side of Dawn by Justine Davis


The third in a trilogy that includes Stevie's Chase and Left at the AltarMorning Side of Dawn follows the story of "supermodel" Cassie "Cassandra" Cameron, who is being stalked and thinks she may have had enough of the world of modeling. Enter Dar Cordell, a friend of her brother's who is the only one able to protect her while her brother and sister-in-law are out of town on a much-needed family vacation and her sister-in-law's brother and his wife are dealing with a difficult first pregnancy. Dar is attractive, an athlete, and a double leg amputee who hides away from the world when he is not competing in - and winning - races. The two romantic leads are, perhaps, overly perfect - a supermodel and a super athlete, but this is a romance novel, after all, and they have their faults as well. There are many obstacles in their way, not least of  all their own stubbornness.

What sets this book apart from others in the romance genre is the handsome Dar Cordell, a very rare example of a double leg amputee being the leading man/hero of the story. Justine Davis realistically portrays his physical experiences and reality while, at the same time, showing him as attractive and desirable exactly as he is. If you like "wounded hero" romances, this is definitely one of the better examples of that genre. And it is not a bodice-ripper, although it does have its intimate moments which are well worth the wait as the story builds and Cassie and Dar's friendship and romance build along with it. It is sexy without being smutty, and it leaves you wanting more.

While this book is best read after reading the other two in the trilogy first, it also stands well on its own. It is intelligently written, well-researched, and, most importantly, it engages the reader in a way that makes you really care about what happens, not just to the main characters, but to the supporting characters as well. I definitely recommend it to anyone who enjoys wounded hero romances, and Dar Cordell is one of the best wounded heroes I've encountered in all of my reading. Justine Davis has shown real commitment to her material and to the various characters who are included in these books by writing a trilogy rather than stand-alone novels, and I have yet to find any other romance novels that even come close to giving us another hero like Dar Cordell.

Book Review: Left at the Altar by Justine Davis


Left at the Altar is the second in a series of three books by author Justine Davis. This sequel to Stevie's Chase tells the story of Stevie's brother, Sean, who lost his fiancee after he lost his leg. Now, Rory has come back into Sean's life and he is torn between the hurt and devastation he felt when she left him standing at the altar and the love he still feels for her. She is desperate for Sean to understand why she left, and she is in danger from the man she left him for. There is a lot more to her story than Sean ever knew, and as they reconnect, and as he learns the real reason she left him, we watch as Sean tries to decide what he feels for her and where to go from there.

Justine Davis has done her research well to portray an amputee character in an accurate and well-rounded way and as a romantic lead, and the reason she wrote Sean's story, she says, is because fans of Stevie's Chase contacted her and wanted to know more about Sean and to see a story with him as the lead.

This is an excellent wounded-hero romance, and I recommend not only this book but the whole series, which is best when read in the correct order. Start with Stevie's Chase (another wounded-hero romance about a man on the run [Chase] and the woman [Stevie] who figures out his true identity), then read Left at the Altar, and finish it off with Morning Side of Dawn, which is another excellent wounded-hero romance which tells the story of Sean's best friend, Dar, who is a double leg amputee, and Chase's sister, Cassie. I have re-read this series multiple times and still love them every single time. If you like wounded-hero romance, and if you like romance featuring characters like Sean and Dar, you'll like this trilogy by Justine Davis.

Short Story Review: "Helping Hand" by Eden LaFont


A little bit of research and a lot more detail could have made this story so much better, but I applaud the author's willingness to go where so very, very few others have dared to go in romantic/erotic literature.  I would not recommend buying this short story, however, because it lacks some very important elements which are both basic and necessary for good erotic literature.

I really wanted to be turned on by this story.  Truly, I did, but there just wasn't enough detail in the story to build myself a mental picture of the male lead, and the sex in the story lacked the emotion and sensuality that draws female readers in and makes us really feel and connect with the eroticism of a story.  Female readers like a story that ignites our emotions and not just our sex drives.  We like details that help us to visualize the characters and the scene.  And we like there to be an actual reason for the connection between the two romantic leads.  We like characters in whom we can see ourselves, and we like characters who are complex.  This story had none of these elements, and it was thoroughly lacking in emotional connection and eroticism.

While it was great to find a story with a double arm amputee male sexual/romantic lead, which is extremely rare to find, more detail and realism regarding James's arms would have greatly improved the story. For example, we are told that James has lost his arms in an accident, but we have absolutely no idea of how much of his arms he lost or the appearance of what he has left. The narrator describes them as "nubs" and "nubby arms", but we don't know if he lost them above or below the elbows, and we don't really have an idea of what James looks like or how he moves as a result of his injuries. As a woman with personal experience with the story's subject matter, I can tell you that these details do make a difference, both to the ways the characters touch one another and to the way the male lead wears and uses his prostheses.  There is a whole world of possibilities for erotic touch between a woman and a double arm amputee and the author sadly ignored all of them. 

Additionally, a bit more proofreading would have been nice. "Scaring" only has one "r".

For the low price I paid for the story on Amazon Kindle ($0.99), it was alright, and it definitely wasn't the same old story we've all read a thousand times, but there is definitely room for improvement.  If you want a really superb story to read with a similar theme, I recommend "Support Our Troops" by Robyn Bradley.  It's so very much better than "Helping Hand".